Summary: On June 27, 2025, Berlin data-protection commissioner Meike Kamp asked Apple and Google to review removing DeepSeek from German app stores after the company failed to provide convincing evidence that its data handling meets EU requirements. The action is described as a referral rather than a direct takedown order, and neither platform had said whether it would act. Italy had already banned the app earlier in 2025.
On June 27, 2025, Meike Kamp, Berlin’s commissioner for data protection and freedom of information, formally asked Apple and Google to review removing DeepSeek, the Chinese AI app, from Germany’s app stores. Her stated reason: the company failed to provide “convincing evidence” that it handles user data in line with EU legal requirements.
It is not Europe’s first move against DeepSeek. Italy banned the app from its stores earlier in 2025 over similar data protection concerns; Germany’s intervention now brings the same fight to the continent’s largest economy. TechCrunch and CNBC both reported the development that day, with CNBC framing it as part of steadily rising European pressure on the Chinese AI app.
What Berlin is alleging
Kamp’s case rests on a procedure that had already run its course: her office had asked DeepSeek to either bring its data-transfer practices into line with EU rules or withdraw the app from Germany voluntarily. The company did neither, so the regulator turned to the distribution layer instead. In her report, she wrote that “Chinese authorities have far-reaching access rights to personal data within the sphere of influence of Chinese companies” — the core of the removal argument.
Per TechCrunch’s summary, two details kept coming up from European consumer privacy groups: DeepSeek is built and operated out of China, and its privacy policy states that the information it collects and stores sits in China. Measured against EU requirements for transfers of personal data outside the bloc, that is the backdrop for the finding that no convincing evidence of compliance was produced.
The decision now sitting with Apple and Google
Strictly speaking, this is not a takedown order but a referral: the two companies must review the report and decide whether to remove DeepSeek from the German App Store and Play Store. That “regulator pressures, platform executes” model is an unusually direct lever inside the GDPR framework — app stores control distribution, and one regional removal can bite harder than a slow-moving fine. As of Friday, neither platform had said whether it would act, and the outcome is worth tracking.
How Europe’s pressure escalated
Put the timeline together. In January 2025, DeepSeek rattled the AI industry with low-cost open-weight reasoning models and its app shot to the top of the download charts. Data protection authorities across Europe then began examining where user data actually flows. Italy moved first with a store ban on similar grounds, and Germany has now applied the pressure at scale. CNBC’s read is that scrutiny is extending from data compliance to distribution itself — regulators are no longer only asking what a model provider’s terms say, but where users can install the app in the first place.
What it means for developers and enterprises
For AI app developers, the lesson is less about DeepSeek than about the path: operating in the EU, your data egress architecture — where data lands, the legal basis for cross-border transfers, third-party and government access risk — now directly determines shelf space. This scrutiny does not stop at chatbots; any app shipping user data into a contested jurisdiction is in scope.
Enterprise IT and procurement teams should take the same note: when adopting AI tools built in China, data-flow and vendor-jurisdiction review belongs in vendor selection, not after a regulator asks. The other signal worth watching is enforcement mechanics. Apple and Google are turning from neutral channels into de facto AI compliance executors, and how smoothly that regulator-to-platform channel works may shape the market more than any single fine.
Beyond platform enforcement
A takedown is not the only possible ending. For DeepSeek, a technical path exists: localizing European users’ data inside the EU and restricting access from teams in China would directly answer Kamp’s core concern — the same playbook other multinational AI services use to operate in Europe, with cost and speed as the only real obstacles. For Apple and Google, the decision cuts both ways: refusing to act means standing against a national regulator, while complying means managing user demand and business realities. Either way, this exchange becomes a reference case for “national regulators asking platforms to delist AI apps” — a European approach is taking shape, and DeepSeek is its first test subject.